Guests Speak, No. 3
Blog Skepticism
by Ankush Khardori
I'm glad to see you've started this blog. You now hold the dubious
distinction of being the first person I know personally to do such a thing.
In my mind, a lot is riding on whether or not you're able to be successful: If you are, I'm going to have to stop deriding blogs at every opportunity I get.
by Ankush Khardori
I'm glad to see you've started this blog. You now hold the dubious
distinction of being the first person I know personally to do such a thing.
In my mind, a lot is riding on whether or not you're able to be successful: If you are, I'm going to have to stop deriding blogs at every opportunity I get.
To be fair and not to discourage you, my open disdain for these things
has more to do with their role in creating and propagating political
rumors; their authors' smug but emarrassingly unjustified sense of
self-importance (see, for example, http://slate.msn.com/id/2112621);
and the idea that otherwise useless people can make a living by linking
to *other* people's writing and adding easy irony or sarcasm (see, for
example, http://www.wonkette.com and http://www.gawker.com;
as well as http://slate.msn.com/id/2096976/).
Obviously, none of the above applies to you, and I've really liked the
few posts I've read thus far -- even though I think Coleridge a far
superior romantic poet to Byron. I'm just kidding; my knowledge of
Coleridge is limited to the oft-repeated (but infrequently attributed)
phrase, "willing suspension of disbelief." But I digress.
9 Comments:
This was not a response to 'A Call to Action'; it was a reaction to this blog in general, but, Ankush, you said I could quote freely from it.
Also, "some of your Springfield friends" are my words. Ankush specifically listed which friends. Is this censorship or good taste?
Scratch part of my last comment. The sentence in question has been removed by request of the writer.
Thanks for the redaction, Fred.
As to whether initially it was censorship or good taste? -- it was both.
Thanks for the redaction, Fred.
As to whether initially it was censorship or good taste? -- it was both.
How did that get posted twice? Damn computers. That's the last time I try to interact with a blog!
Except for this time.
All for a comment being posted twice? Seems a small crime to me.
Also, redaction -- good word.
i feel like "their authors' smug but emarrassingly unjustified sense ofself-importance"
might apply to whoever authors such a statement.
other than that, though, much love for the khardoris + their angst.
ouch... see, this is why i should steer clear of blogs... so that i don't get scoffed at by people kind enough to insult me on the one hand, while also posting under "anonymous" on the other.
True that. Keep it clean, anonymous, or else don't be anonymous.
Post a Comment
<< Home